ffp vs sfp: Which is Best for Hunting
In this guide, I’m going to provide the direct comparison ffp vs sfp, so you can choose which one would perform better for your hunting.
Before start the discussion, I want to confirm that I have used both scopes (ffp and sfp) and would help you to explain which would be better for you.
The shooter must determine what the rifle will be used for 80-90% of the time. The intended application can help determine specific shooter needs that includes whether the benefits of FFP or SFP scopes are right for common approaches such as hunting, long range, or the AR-15.
Let’s Start!
ffp vs sfp scope
FFP (First Focal Plane) and SFP (Second Focal Plane) are two different types of reticle placement in rifle scopes. Here’s a comparison of FFP and SFP:
First Focal Plane (FFP):
1. Reticle Placement: In FFP scopes, the reticle is located in the first focal plane, which means that the reticle’s size remains consistent in relation to the target throughout all magnification levels. When the magnification is increased, the reticle appears to grow along with the target.
2. Reticle Subtensions: The subtensions (marks or hash marks) on the FFP reticle remain true at all magnification levels. This allows for accurate holdover, windage, and ranging measurements at any magnification setting.
3. Range Estimation: FFP reticles are particularly useful for range estimation, as the reticle subtensions can be used at any magnification to calculate the distance to the target.
4. Precision Shooting: FFP scopes are popular among long-range shooters and precision shooters who require consistent reticle subtensions and accurate measurements across different magnification settings.
Second Focal Plane (SFP):
1. Reticle Placement: In SFP scopes, the reticle is located in the second focal plane, which means that the reticle’s size remains constant while the target size changes with magnification adjustments.
2. Reticle Subtensions: The subtensions on SFP reticles are accurate and maintain their size only at a specific magnification setting, typically the highest magnification level. When the magnification is changed, the subtensions appear to shrink or enlarge in relation to the target.
3. Sight Picture: SFP scopes often provide a simpler sight picture, especially at low magnifications, as the reticle doesn’t obscure the target as much as it would in FFP scopes at the same magnification.
4. Hunting and Close-Range Shooting: SFP scopes are commonly used in hunting and close- to mid-range shooting scenarios, where quick target acquisition and a less cluttered sight picture are advantageous.
Choosing between FFP and SFP depends on your specific shooting needs and preferences. FFP scopes excel in applications where accurate subtension measurements and range estimation are crucial, while SFP scopes offer a simpler sight picture and are more suited for quick target acquisition at specific magnification settings.
first focal plane vs second focal plane
Certainly! Here’s a more detailed comparison between FFP (First Focal Plane) and SFP (Second Focal Plane) scopes:
Reticle Size:
– FFP: In FFP scopes, the reticle size changes proportionally with the target size as you adjust the magnification. This means the reticle appears larger or smaller in relation to the target at different magnification levels.
– SFP: In SFP scopes, the reticle size remains constant regardless of the magnification level. The reticle appears the same size regardless of how much you zoom in or out.
Reticle Subtensions:
– FFP: FFP scopes maintain the reticle’s subtension values consistently throughout the magnification range. This allows for accurate holdover, windage corrections, and ranging at any magnification setting.
– SFP: SFP scopes retain the subtensions’ accuracy only at a specific magnification level, often the highest. As you adjust the magnification, the subtensions appear larger or smaller in relation to the target, which can affect the accuracy of holdovers and range estimations.
Range Estimation:
– FFP: FFP scopes are particularly advantageous for range estimation. The reticle subtensions can be used to measure the target’s size and calculate its distance at any magnification level.
– SFP: While SFP scopes can be used for range estimation, it’s typically only accurate at the specific magnification level where the subtensions are calibrated. Range estimations may require adjustments or calculations based on the specific magnification used.
Sight Picture:
– FFP: FFP scopes can appear busier or cluttered at higher magnifications due to the larger reticle size. This can be a consideration for shooters who prefer a clear sight picture.
– SFP: SFP scopes generally offer a simpler sight picture, especially at lower magnifications, as the reticle remains a constant size. This can make target acquisition quicker and easier, particularly in fast-paced shooting scenarios.
Common Applications:
– FFP: FFP scopes are commonly used in long-range shooting and precision shooting scenarios where accurate subtension measurements and ranging are crucial.
– SFP: SFP scopes are popular for hunting, tactical shooting, and close- to mid-range engagements where quick target acquisition and a simpler sight picture are often prioritized.
Ultimately, the choice between FFP and SFP scopes depends on your shooting needs and preferences. FFP scopes excel in situations requiring accurate subtensions and range estimation at different magnification levels, while SFP scopes offer simplicity, quick target acquisition, and ease of use within a specific magnification range.
ffp vs sfp: Which is Best for Hunting
When it comes to hunting, the choice between FFP (First Focal Plane) and SFP (Second Focal Plane) scopes depends on various factors and personal preferences. Here are some considerations:
1. Range Estimation: If you frequently need to estimate the range of your target, an FFP scope can be beneficial. The reticle subtensions in an FFP scope remain consistent at any magnification level, allowing you to use them for accurate range estimation without needing to adjust for specific magnifications.
2. Holdover and Windage Corrections: FFP scopes can also be advantageous for precise holdover and windage corrections. As the reticle size changes with magnification, the subtensions maintain their accuracy, making it easier to adjust for bullet drop and wind drift.
3. Sight Picture at Low Magnifications: SFP scopes generally offer a simpler and less cluttered sight picture at low magnifications. This can be beneficial when hunting in dense vegetation or in situations where quick target acquisition is essential.
4. Flexibility: If you prefer to use a specific magnification setting for hunting, an SFP scope might be suitable. The reticle size remains constant at that specific magnification, providing consistency in aiming and making it easier to acquire targets quickly.
5. Personal Preference: Ultimately, the choice between FFP and SFP for hunting comes down to personal preference and shooting style. Some hunters prefer the versatility and precision of an FFP scope, while others prioritize a clear sight picture and quick target acquisition offered by an SFP scope.
It’s important to consider your specific hunting needs, the typical shooting distances, and the type of game you pursue when making a decision. It can also be helpful to try out both FFP and SFP scopes in person, if possible, to see which type feels more comfortable and suits your hunting style.